You should receive a copy of the other side's motion that was filed with the court. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Id. As soon as you receive this motion, read it carefully. We are currently collect data for this state. 2. ), A trial court is acting well within its discretion to deny a motion to compel discovery on the basis that the mandated separate statement was not provided or the statement provided does not comply with the requirements of the Court Rule. (4), The Declaration and Claim for Privilege establishes that all nine documents on the Confidential Schedule fall squarely within the deliberative process privilege. TENTATIVE RULING: Providence Journal, 981 F.2d at 562. By signing up you are agreeing to receive emails according to our privacy policy. As soon as you receive this motion, read it carefully. Send the other defendant a copy of your motion. _______________________________ GREGORY S. VISTNES. Separate statement: All motions to compel further responses in California state court must include a separate statement in accordance with C.R.C., Rule 3.1345, stating the. Brian Leung v. Alireza Alivandivafa You cant respond to a request that you dont understand. Defendant further requests $2,365 in monetary sanctions. Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1345(c). Clinton M. Sandvick worked as a civil litigator in California for over 7 years. Exhibit 1: Policy Statements at 1. Brockway v. Dep't of Air Force, 518 F.2d 1184, 1193 (8th Cir. P. 26(a)(2)(B), the United States will produce (as it would have without regard to the instant motion) documents considered by its expert witness on the date scheduled for production of the report, to the extent such documents have not previously been produced. If the requested information wasnt relevant, then you might not feel they are entitled to it. If you have a lawyer, then the motion was served on your lawyer. These documents reflect the deliberations, considerations, analyses, and recommendations of Antitrust Division staff and officials concerning the enforcement of the antitrust laws. (Pelton-Shepherd Industries, Inc. v. Delta Packaging Products, Inc. (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 1568, 1586-1587 (the fact that a party does not have a right to have a discovery motion heard after the discovery motion cutoff date does not mean the court has no power to hear it, or that the court errs in hearing it.)), A party may obtain relief from a waiver of objections to interrogatories and a request for production when the party subsequently serves responses and the failure to serve a timely response was the result of a mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. Defendants are not entitled to a schedule of documents withheld because to do so discloses information that the privilege was intended to protect. In Pacific Molasses Co. v. NLRB, 577 F.2d 1172, 1183 (5th Cir. The paper submits a May 27, 1993 draft policy position for hospital mergers and a draft May 27, 1993 paper discussing a possible safe harbor for hospital mergers, which textually cites statistics, including one textual chart, to support its analysis. A sample "meet and . The deliberative process privilege also protects from disclosure the draft document (number 8 on the Confidential Schedule) that could have developed, but did not, into an explanation of the Policy Statements. SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIERS TO PROVIDE FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS [SET ONE]; AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS [Filed concurrently with Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion, Points and Authorities and Declaration of Bob H. Joyce] Date: October 12, 2007 Time: 9:00 a.m. 1000 An official website of the United States government. will be able to access it on trellis. NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 138 (1974). "G,*X+%G" &2X 'XG TG *'TG2X+G, 2L "2*(G&T, "ng Appasktkaj snfii hg hfsgd aj tnks Appasktkaj! This sort of motion most commonly deals with discovery disputes, when a party who has propounded discovery to either the opposing party or a third party believes that the discovery responses are insufficient. SC129356 This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content), and, DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL IS MOOT AS TO, THE ONLY DOCUMENTS STILL AT ISSUE ARE NOT. Opposition to Motion to Compel Discovery - California Los Angeles Superior Court of California December 31, 2022 Opposition to Motion to Compel Discovery Superior Court of California Los Angeles Timing 9 Court Days Before the Hearing All opposition papers must be filed and served at least 9 court days before the hearing. THOMPSON VS CONTINENTAL LABOR RESOURCES, INC. Motion to Compel 12/04/2018 - Motion to Compel, Motion to Compel - def Reeder's Motion to Compel Pltf Barmore to File Unde, Barmore et al -v- Circa Management, Inc. et al Print, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL AND REQUEST SANCTIONS, DEFENDANT, MICHELLE HUANG ET AL VS. SANDEEP ANDRE HINGORANI ET AL, Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories, Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Motion to Compel Deposition of Person Most Qualified (PMQ). Unsworn responses are tantamount to no responses at all. (Appleton v. Super. Koss, Charles A, and United States v. Jacob, 781 F.2d 643, 646-47 (8th Cir. For example, the other side might have served requests for production of emails relating to a topic. Background Separate Statement of Items in Dispute. Material must not be incorporated into the separate statement by reference. The United States does not have any documents responsive to defendants' first request for "Senior Officials' Communications.". may be governed by the Code of Civil Procedure ("C.C.P."), the California Rules of Court ("C.R.C."), local court rules, or all three. I am the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ("Antitrust Division"). Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405.). Moreover, it is protected from discovery by the intragovernmental deliberative process privilege, as set forth in the Declaration and Claim of Privilege of Acting Assistant Attorney General Robert E. Litan, which is attached as Exhibit 3. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION, OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIFF. Separate statement: All motions to compel further responses in California state court must include a separate statement in accordance with C.R.C., Rule 3.1345, stating the specific discovery request, the response given, the factual and legal reasons for compelling further responses, etc., or, if allowed by the court, "a concise outline of the. This article has been viewed 16,054 times. The discovery request was too vague or ambiguous. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. P. 11 underscores that the legality of the defendants' proposed partnership -- and not the government's decision to challenge it -- is the only issue in this lawsuit. tng fttfcngd `g`arfjdu` al pakjts fjd, futnarktkgs! The staff selected for inclusion in the documents all tables, maps and other statistical or numerical information. STATEMENT OF FACTS. There probably wont be time to argue much more. The Court must also consider the context of the creation of the documents at issue in applying the foregoing principles. Contributor Robin Mashal Los Angeles, California Commercial Litigation (310) 286-2000 About I am a litigation lawyer, licensed to practice law in the State of California. NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck, 421 U.S. at 151 n.18. C. Glassdoor's Opposition to Payward's Motion to Compel. by During a lawsuit, each side can request information and documents from each other. The paper also includes a table from an outside source showing distribution of hospitals by size. ), PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED, Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited, 1 If the court tries to compel disclosure, then you might be able to bring an immediate appeal. Finally, the United States opposes production of the third category of documents, namely, those described by defendants as "all tabulations, accumulations of data, and other statistical or numerical information. You have actually complied with the discovery request. The motions that require a separate statement include a motion: (1) To compel further responses to requests for admission; > > Read More.. Ask for a copy. represented by In accordance with 28 U.S.C. R. Civ. TENTATIVE RULING: (Code Civ. Garrett A. Marshall for Defendant Presbyterian Camp and Conference Centers, Inc. [and/or] (2) An objection to a particular request is without merit or too general. when new changes related to " are available. Mink, 410 U.S. at 92. ), Rules of Court, rule 3.1348(a), explains, The court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though no opposition to the motion was filed, or opposition to the motion was withdrawn, or the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after motion was filed. (See also Code Civ. A motion to compel asks the court to order either the opposing party or a third party to take some action. (The ninth document is a document of the Federal Trade Commission; therefore the Division has referred that document to the Commission to determine whether it has any privilege to assert regarding its discovery.). against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a further response to interrogatories, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust." (Code of Civ. However, it is not important to draft the separate Couns., Inc. v. Pac. The motions that require a separate statement include a motion: (1) To compel further responses to requests for admission; (2) To compel further responses to interrogatories; (3) To compel further responses to a demand for inspection of documents or tangible things; (5) To compel or to quash the production of documents or tangible things at a deposition; (6) For medical examination over objection; and, (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1987, January 1, 1992, January 1, 1997, and July 1, 2001.). Motion ..quest is evasive or incomplete. Instead, on August 2, they filed their Second Request For Production Of Documents, seeking documents issued after issuance of the Policy Statements. Does 1 Through 20 Inclusive, Your subscription has successfully been upgraded. This separate statement must be concurrently filed with the notice of motion and motion . A similar document, not described in the Confidential Schedule, was prepared by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"). 1. Read all of the motions. Except as provided in 3.1345(b), any motion involving the content of a discovery request or the responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate statement. Dept: (2) When a court has allowed the moving party to submit-in place of a separate statement-a concise outline of the discovery request and each response in dispute. By failing to respond to an inspection demand, the offending party waives any objection to the demand. A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. to Def The maps analyze the geographic distribution of hospitals of certain sizes. Fed. This analysis is comprised of two documents, one of 12 pages and the other of eight pages. All that need be shown in the moving papers is that a set of interrogatories was properly served on the opposing party, that the time to respond has expired, and that no response of any kind has been served. 6 The United States objected on the grounds of relevance and privilege. Any opposition to the motion must be served and filed within five days of service of the moving papers and may be no longer than 15 pages. 8 You can always see your envelopes R. Civ. "The policy statements give health care providers guidance in the form of 'antitrust safety zones,' which describe the circumstances under which the Agencies will not challenge conduct as violative of the antitrust laws as a matter of prosecutorial discretion." MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES Obtaining an Order that the Opposing Side . Sample language could read: Defendant opposes Plaintiffs Motion for an Order To Compel on the grounds that (1) the documents requested are not relevant to the lawsuit and (2) certain relevant documents are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege., For example, if you are refusing to turn documents over because they are not relevant, then remind the court of the rules regarding relevancy: Rule 26(b)(1) limits discovery to any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any partys claim or defense. If a party wants broader discovery, then it must show good cause to support the request. VS THE ALLERGY AND ASTHMA CLINI, Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (CCP 2030.300), Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Motion for Order Deeming Admitted Truth of Facts and Genuineness of Documents, La Paloma Ranch LLC et al vs Presbyterian Camp and Conference Centers, Inc. et al. Id. for Sanctions; to Deft's Req. He received his JD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD in American History from the University of Oregon in 2013. Also listen to the questions the judge asks. Health. Exhibit 3 resolves defendants' procedural arguments regarding invocation of the privilege. The district court denied Sundance's motion to compel arbitration based on waiver. Legal Standard 9 Separate Statement in Support of Motion to Compel Further Responses This is a good sample of separate statement required for bringing motion to compel further responses. 4 Last. Attorney For The Defendant, Luther, Robert Stevenson Disclosure of the data at issue in that case, in contrast to disclosure of that at issue here, would not have "enable[d] the public to reconstruct any of the protected deliberative process." They should be cited as "Civil L.R.___". 1992), the data at issue was census data, not factual information gathered and analyzed by governmental officials during the course of their deliberations. MATTER: (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Plaintiff Eric P. Hvolboll to Provide Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, ..RNEYS: Melissa M. Fassett for Plaintiffs La Paloma Ranch, LLC and Eric P. Hvolboll 4/30/2021 Your subscription has successfully been upgraded. (St 1) La Paloma Ranch/Req. Defendants have limited Request 13 from its previously broad scope. This article was co-authored by Clinton M. Sandvick, JD, PhD. A series of ten maps showing the geographic distribution of hospitals in accordance with the size of the hospitals. (Cal. A motion concerning interrogatories, inspection demands, or admission requests must identify the interrogatories, demands, or requests by set and number. These are the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Put the certificate on a separate sheet of paper titled Certificate of Service in all caps, bold. As to Requests 4 and 7, defendants have in correspondence and their moving papers limited the original requests to documents on which an expert witness relies in forming the expert's report, thereby meeting the United States' objections. A motion to compel the deposition of a party to the action must also be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration, or, when the deponent failed to attend the deposition, a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance. Ct. (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 1240, 1270.) Your content views addon has successfully been added. If the judge is more interested in one issue than another, you can lead off with that issue when it is your turn to speak. Yes, the separate statement is arguably the most important component of an opposition to a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant to Provide Further Responses and Request for Sanctions is DENIED. Plaintiff also refiled the Motions on March 25 and 30, 2020 with accompanying declarations and separate statements. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The separate statement is the keystone of the opposition No document is more important in opposing summary judgment than the Separate Statement. Box 74950 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52407 Tel: (319) 363-0091 Fax: (319) 363-6110, _______________________________ Mary Beth McGee Eugene D. Cohen Richard S. Martin Jessica N. Cohen U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 555 4th Street, N.W. Prepare the Motion You must file a separate motion for each of the discovery responses you wish to compel. I. If the consumer/employee objects or files a motion to quash, the witness is not permitted to respond to your Deposition Subpoena.You may make a Motion to Compel Production (deadline: 20 days after service of the . The remainder of the document discusses a proposed safety zone other than the one for hospital mergers. attorneys or parties who wish to view a portion of a 20 page sample opposition to compel arbitration containing brief instructions, a table of contents and table of . SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FORM INTERROGATORIES IN DISPUTE Defendant City of Los Angeles ("City") hereby submits its Separate Statement of Form Interrogatories in Dispute pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1345. Although Rule 3.1345 of the California Rules of Court does not explicitly provide a remedy for failure to comply with it, at least one appellate court has cited with approval the trial courts dropping of a motion to compel discovery where the moving part failed to comply with Rule 335, which was renumbered as Rule 3.1345. 5. This process, called discovery, usually does not involve the judge. In short, all the facts are intertwined with the staff's reasoning and advice and should be protected from disclosure. Defendants originally sought all documents relating to the "establishment" of the safety zone for hospital mergers or "utilized in determining" the safety zone. The interrogatories are unduly burdensome and oppressive. 1975). ( April 30, 2021 Indeed, in certain instances, the deliberative process privilege protects memoranda of a purely factual nature. ( This article was very helpful in that. AFS SPRINKLER, INC. v. GREEN VALLEY MORTUARY, LTD. TODD MCNAIR VS THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOC ET AL. Defendants' proposed transaction does not fall within the safety zone for hospital mergers, and defendants have so stipulated. MOTIONS Mishelle Neverson vs Brookdale Senior Living Communities, inc. Motion to Compel 02/06/2018 - Motion to Compel. Your alert tracking was successfully added. Proc., 2023.030(a), 2033.280, 2030.290, and 2031.300. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted as subd (b); previously amended effective July 1, 1987; previously relettered effective July 1, 2001.). Do your real argument here. TENTATIVE RULING: Each of defendants four motions to compel further discovery responses is denied for failure to comply with Rule 3.1345 of the California Rules of Court regarding the format of discovery motions. 1986) (rejecting request for discovery). for Sanctions; Further Resp. Plaintiff'S Separate Statement In Opposition To . (12/6/18 Stipulation.) fjd aj sucn atngr arfi fjd$ar dacu`gjtfry gvkdgjcg fs `fy hg prgsgjtgd ft tng, &ftgdQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ, ta yaur pfrtkcuifr sktuftkaj. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY VS FELIPE JAIMES PINEDA, ET AL. Proc., 2031.310(b)(1) requires the moving papers to set forth specific . TENTATIVE RULING: The City respectfully requests permission to deviate from the standard format given the nature of this case and Petitioners' To the extent there is factual material contained in these documents, the facts were deliberately selected from a great volume of potentially relevant facts; they reflect the thought processes of Antitrust Division staff and officials as to the types of facts relevant to possible prosecutorial decisions and antitrust enforcement policy, and the facts are inextricably intertwined with the authors' analyses and recommendations. Providence Journal Co. v. Dep't of the Army, 981 F.2d 552, 562 (1st Cir. Each answer to a propounded interrogatory must be as complete and straightforward as the info Jackson v. Feraj, et al. SEPARATE STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL (TRANSACTION ID # 100123852) FILED BY DEFENDANT BELLINGS, DAVID. Separate Statement. for Prod. Ct. (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 1240, 1270; Neary v. Regents of University of California (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1145. Any motion involving the content of a discovery request or the responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate statement. A July 27, 1993 computer analysis of California hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one another. MV&P makes its motion pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure &167; 2025.450. In accordance with Fed. "I have always been interested in law and the specifics of court proceedings. The eight documents referred to in paragraph 3 above reflect the deliberative processes of the Antitrust Division. A five-page handwritten report of statistics on hospital closings from 1988 to 1991. A 29-page draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for small hospitals in rural areas. try clicking the minimize button instead. . App. 'X "2*(G&T, XG6G,TG" 'XG &2T. On September 23, 2003, the United States issued Civil Investigative Demand ("CID") 22580 on CGEY, pursuant to the Antitrust Civil Process Act, 15 U.S.C. (CCP 2030.300) Ballesteros, Daniel Walter, Defendants did not respond. CAR has filed an. Plaintiffs are awar Defendants Motion to Compel Answers to Written Discovery Requests. The separate statement requirement was designed to streamline adjudication of discovery motions, and a failure to file a separate statement is a sufficient basis for denying plaintiffs motion to compel. Ct. (1980) 111 Cal. In addition, with the exception of a few tables reproduced from published texts, the staff created all tables and maps from larger publicly-available data bases (1989-90 "Individual Hospital Data," California Healthcare Facilities Commission and the American Hospital Association data set on hospitals). (Code Civ. But the court allowed the late motion to compel if the moving party undertook some steps. (Code Civ. This article has been viewed 16,054 times. Los Angeles, California Commercial Litigation (310) 286-2000. Be detailed in the law as to why the objections are garbage. ), Sanctions include attorney's fees. Movant J. Doe ("Doe") hereby submits this Separate Statement pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1345 in support of Doe's motion to quash a subpoena issued to non-party Glassdoor, Inc. . Sample language could read: I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of April, 2016, I caused a copy of the foregoing Motion in Opposition to be served by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on counsel for plaintiff as follows, and then insert the name and address of counsel. We have notified your account executive who will contact you shortly. They were created during the prosecutorial and policy deliberations leading up to publication of the Policy Statements and safety zones. FOR SUBMISSION WITHOUT HEARING represented by will be able to access it on trellis. 19.07.28 Separate Statement MTC - Separate Statement, Filed, Filippini Wealth Management Inc vs Max Baril et al, Separate Statement IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES - Se, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE CALIFORNIA, et al. We use cookies to make wikiHow great. Accessing Verdicts requires a change to your plan. Ballesteros, Daniel Walter try clicking the minimize button instead. R. Civ. Over a period of 8 months, Sundance filed a motion to dismiss, filed an answer, and engaged in mediation, before moving to compel arbitration. HEARING DATE: This is a controversial step. Dept. Pay attention to how much time the judge gives each side to speak and listen to the questions the judge asks. Your subscription was successfully upgraded. (Mills v. U.S. Bank (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 871, 893.) Mapother v. Department of Justice, 3 F.3d 1533, 1538-39 (D.C.Cir. (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2020; adopted effective July 1, 2001.). . The United States opposes Defendants' Motion For An Order To Compel The Production Of Documents From Plaintiff on the grounds that: (1)the motion is now moot as to Requests 4 and 7 as a result of discovery conferences held subsequent to its filing; and (2)the only documents sought by Request 13 that are still at issue are not relevant to this action (nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence) and, in any event, are protected from discovery by the intragovernmental deliberative process privilege. Defendant. Your credits were successfully purchased. The Separate Statement is where the opposition documents intersect: the stand-alone document where everything comes together so the judge can easily see . In short, the document was part of the deliberative process. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. This is a good sample of separate statement required for bringing motion to compel further responses. Code Civ. Deft's Form Interrog (Set 1) to Eric Hvolboll/Req. Please wait a moment while we load this page. (Set 1) to Eric Hvolboll/Req. The Antitrust Division has conducted a search of its files and has located nine documents that arguably fall within that category. Proc., 2033.290(a).) Nrt West, Inc, Dba Coldwell Banker Residential. ), The demanding party shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under 2016.040, or a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance. The paper textually cites statistical information to support the analysis and refers to attached maps to support its analysis. These local rules are promulgated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (CCP 2030.300). 2 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Even if defendants had made such allegations, it is well settled that exercises of prosecutorial discretion are, for the most part, not judiciable. For example, if you are a journalist, then you might have a statutory privilege not to be compelled to release the sources of your information. The motion to compel is used to ask the court to order the non-complying party . Your credits were successfully purchased. II. Disclosure of the tables, maps, statistics and numerical information would reveal the thinking of staff as to which facts were relevant to the deliberations leading up to issuance of the Policy Statements. 10 The Antitrust Division has referred that document to the FTC for its evaluation of whether it is privileged. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. California courts thus have found a waiver of the right to arbitration in a variety of contexts, " ' "ranging from situations in which the party seeking to compel arbitration has previously taken steps inconsistent with an intent to invoke arbitration [citations] to instances in which the petitioning party has unreasonably delayed in . Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1345(a); BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Super. Plaintiff Mercury Insurance Companys Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set O ..Centinela Gas Station, Inc. (Centinela) (collectively, Defendants). In support of its opposition, the United States submits this Memorandum, the Declaration and Claim of Privilege of Robert E. Litan, and the Declaration of Gregory S. Vistnes. The document is privileged. 9 (See also Mills v. U.S. Bank (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 871, 892-893 (trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to compel discovery as plaintiffs separate statement did not comply with the rules of court); Neary v. Regents of University of California (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1145 (trial court properly denied motions to compel discovery because of nonconforming separate statements). 8 By using our site, you agree to our, {"smallUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikihow.com\/images\/thumb\/d\/db\/Oppose-a-Motion-to-Compel-Step-1.jpg\/v4-460px-Oppose-a-Motion-to-Compel-Step-1.jpg","bigUrl":"\/images\/thumb\/d\/db\/Oppose-a-Motion-to-Compel-Step-1.jpg\/aid7732064-v4-728px-Oppose-a-Motion-to-Compel-Step-1.jpg","smallWidth":460,"smallHeight":345,"bigWidth":728,"bigHeight":546,"licensing":"